Pelosi, Schumer To Trump: "Let's Debate Border Funds in Private"

[*bfine32*]

(02-20-2019, 04:55 PM)fredtoast Wrote: This is what happens when you have your own opinion but it conflicts with supporting Trump.  You end up trying to argue both ends of the argument.

If you argue that you don't think it is necessary then you have to admit that there is not enough lawlessness at the border to justify it.  But since you commit so hard to supporting Trump you have to argue that the proper definition for "lawlessness" is just "laws being broken".  You won't back off your support for Trump even with it conflicts with your own personal beliefs.   

Personally I think it is absurd to try and argue that any law being broken anywhere allows the President to use the military for police duties, but as the passive aggressive around here like to coo, "To each his own".

I don't see stating someone has the authority to do something while disagreeing with the choice to do so as arguing both sides of the argument.

But as you say" "To each his own"