02-20-2019, 08:02 PM
(02-20-2019, 07:11 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I don't see stating someone has the authority to do something while disagreeing with the choice to do so as arguing both sides of the argument.
Then back to the original question.
Do you feel that just "laws were broken" is enough "lawlessness" to authorize the President to use the military for police activity? And if so, doesn't that mean he can pretty much do it anytime and anywhere he wants?
