03-01-2019, 04:32 AM
(03-01-2019, 12:11 AM)hollodero Wrote: Well, back then everyone was scared about a possible president Trump... so that's not fair either.
Also, the part of the article quoted just represents the words of a Mr. Andrew Puzdar, which after a quick google search I identify as a severely biased source.
The author of the article himself concludes "The bottom line is that there’s no reason to expect big economic improvements under Trump, at least in the long run. His good policies on taxes and regulation are offset by bad policies on spending and trade."
That would account for eight months at most, and most people thought Hillary would win easily. Maybe that scared them. If they were scared by a potential Trump presidency then it should have really nose dived when he was actually elected.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
