03-01-2019, 11:08 AM
(03-01-2019, 10:52 AM)michaelsean Wrote: Nobody, including the article, says the 21 months is the end all be all. It would be stupid to declare success after 21 months. It was merely posted as a rebuttal.
So the rebuttal to an article about data available for the past so far is that the article doesn't use data they may not even have? Even thought the article didn't even say that is the "end all be all"?
Okie dokie.
That really reads like "I don't like what the data says so I'll complain that they don't have up to date data for the extra couple months rather than acknowledge what the data says DID happen."
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
