Trump & GOP promised economic growth much better than Obama.That's not what happened

[hollodero]

(03-04-2019, 05:03 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Before Trump was declared winner, who was scared he would win?

Well... I was...

(03-04-2019, 05:03 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Everything I ever read said Hillary would win. Once Trump won though, that's when the stock market started shooting up and that's not open for dispute.

Fair enough. My remarks weren't quite serious.

(03-04-2019, 05:03 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: As far as Bias goes, I don't hear you complaining about the OP's extreme left slanted bias.

If you mean in general, I had my polite disagreements with the OP and nearly anyone really. If you mean specifically, well, I guess I didn't feel like doing that. That doesn't mean anything though.

(03-04-2019, 05:03 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: I mean geeez Harwood was busy giving Clinton's group advice while getting questions from Podesta to ask the Republicans while moderating the Republican Debate. At the end of the debate, all we had learned is that Harwood is a Liberal ass.

I have no idea how to explain how irrelevant I feel that is, for everything really.

(03-04-2019, 05:03 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: And yes, its quite possible that there will be no more big economic movement under Trump, but we won't know that for sure until 2024 when he's finally out of office.

Just to be clear, that is the take of the author of the article you linked. The one that had Mr. Puzdars numbers in it that you reflected.

It isn't necessarily my take. My take is that you pay for that economic movement by destroying the environment, by piling up debt your children will have to pay for, by allowing a new financial crisis to happen, by losing all movability when the next recession hits, by further widening the gap between rich and poor, and by impairing working conditions.