Poll: should the Bengals draft, trade for or sign a backup who has the potential to take over the starting job when Andy's current contract is up?
Yes
No
[Show Results]
 
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should our backup QB for 2019 be future starter quality or just backup quality?
#3
(03-05-2019, 04:52 PM)BengalChris Wrote: Clearly Driskel is not going to be a starter in the NFL and he might not even be a backup quality QB.

But for 2019, should the Bengals draft, trade for or sign a backup who has the potential to take over the starting job when Andy's current contract is up?

Examples would be trading for Josh Rosen, drafting a player like Finley or Daniel Jones, or signing some QB on a prove it deal.

Interesting question.  Should the backup be a guy who can take the stater's job and keep it warm till the starter gets back or should he be a guy who can take the starter's job and keep it?
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein

http://www.reverbnation.com/leftyohio  singersongwriterrocknroll



Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Should our backup QB for 2019 be future starter quality or just backup quality? - McC - 03-05-2019, 04:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)