Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hart signing does not bother me as long as it does not dictate Draft strategy
#10
(03-13-2019, 02:23 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I've posted about how free agency is weak at Tackle and we should draft one. I still see that as our best path.

But, we still need a starting TE. We may need a CB. We need a starting OT and Guard. We need a LB.


Offensive Tackles are seeming to be hard to come by lately.

As you say, Free Agency is fairly weak at Tackle and seems LOADED at defensive position. The early part of the 2019 Draft also seems LOADED at defensive positions.

Signing Hart may not be such a bad thing if COUPLED with a first round Offensive Tackle with 10 year stud potential or even an early 2nd rounder.

Defensive players may seep deeper into the 2nd and 3rd rounds given how plentiful they seem to be in Free Agency & in this coming Draft.

May want to Corner the Offensive Tackle Market in the Draft early since the pickings are fairly few and other teams are in need of them.

Hart becomes a valuable short term Bridge to an Upgrade.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Hart signing does not bother me as long as it does not dictate Draft strategy - depthchart - 03-13-2019, 02:32 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)