03-15-2019, 08:31 PM
(03-15-2019, 06:41 PM)Benton Wrote: https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/polish-weeklys-front-page-teaches-how-to-recognize-a-jew
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/seven-suspected-neo-nazis-arrested-allegedly-plotting-terror-attack-n915331
https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/jewish-restaurant-in-german-town-chemnitz-attacked-by-neo-nazis-1.6464348
https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/national/deadly-charlottesville-car-attack-what-know-now/K2eySRjiJAoCmXpttltBSK/
Etc, etc.
But white supremacists and radical Muslims aren't very comparable. But I would note that, in general, a key difference is that radical Muslims tend to avoid violence in places that don't fit into the never-ending self-imposed genocide between their major factions, unless of course you step in between that fight, whereas white supremacists tend to search out the folks their opposed to.
But I would argue that where radical Muslims "tend" to do their attacks etc... isn't really the point here. The point is, what do these radical Muslims want, how much are they progressing towards these goals, how influential are they to the overall world population in terms of their goals, and how many people are dying because of their goals in current times.
The suggestion that white supremacists are moving at as fast as a destructive pace as radical Muslims because Nazis murdered a bunch of people 80 years ago isn't a good argument imo.
Sure, I get it, white supremacy is a bad thing and caused a lot of people to be killed. But who is causing the most destruction around the world in recent years and influencing more people to do evil?
