Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Taxes
#21
(03-22-2019, 11:59 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Yes, we had a top rate of 70% for about 60 years, and not a single soul ever actually paid 70%. My scenario was if you removed all the loopholes, deductions, and the like and actually forced them to pay 70%. If you maintain all the loopholes, it wouldn't work, because people would simply find ways to not have to pay anywhere near that much in taxes, and we couldn't maintain current standards. If you look it up, there are people who did research. When the tax rate was at 70% in 1980, the top 1% only *actually* paid about 23%.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-wealthy-americans-like-jack-benny-avoided-paying-a-70-tax-rate-11547807401
(It's a subscribe article, but the fact that it exists at least tells you I am not just making it up, lol.)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Also, you are in for a world of shock if you think the top 25% far exceeds the $300-400k range.

https://www.investopedia.com/personal-finance/how-much-income-puts-you-top-1-5-10/

Top 5% in 2017 had an average wage of $299,810.
To break into the top 10% in 2017, you needed to earn $118.400.
To break into the top 1%, $716,766.
To break into the top 0.1%, $2,756,865.

Now those numbers don't include capital gains and such, and is just income, but the point remains. Your scenario would involve taxing 70% on people making less than $100k/yr. That means people making $100k/yr would be only getting $30k/yr. According to the poverty line, if the $100k job was their only income, and it was a family of 5, 70% tax rate would leave them right at the poverty line ($29,420 in 2018).

Where reach people get real rich is stock worth and the like, which isn't "income". That could probably be adjusted, but you sure don't want to go 70% there, or people are going to stop investing in the economy and just hoard all of their wealth like Scrooge McDuck in a vault, rather than put it back into circulation.

Yeah. You are right about the average incomes. I was thinking weath rather than income (something I often self-righteously accuse others of...LOL!).

But certainly we can hit up that top 1%, eh. They got more money than they know what to do with. Let's get 'em!!! Ninja
[Image: 416686247_404249095282684_84217049823664...e=659A7198]





Messages In This Thread
Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-22-2019, 05:29 PM
RE: Taxes - TheLeonardLeap - 03-22-2019, 06:13 PM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-22-2019, 06:21 PM
RE: Taxes - fredtoast - 03-22-2019, 06:45 PM
RE: Taxes - Benton - 03-22-2019, 07:45 PM
RE: Taxes - CJD - 03-22-2019, 06:34 PM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-22-2019, 06:43 PM
RE: Taxes - fredtoast - 03-22-2019, 06:49 PM
RE: Taxes - TheLeonardLeap - 03-22-2019, 07:47 PM
RE: Taxes - fredtoast - 03-23-2019, 11:42 AM
RE: Taxes - Belsnickel - 03-22-2019, 08:41 PM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-22-2019, 08:53 PM
RE: Taxes - Belsnickel - 03-22-2019, 09:04 PM
RE: Taxes - TheLeonardLeap - 03-22-2019, 09:27 PM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-22-2019, 10:56 PM
RE: Taxes - TheLeonardLeap - 03-22-2019, 11:59 PM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-23-2019, 12:28 AM
RE: Taxes - TheLeonardLeap - 03-23-2019, 12:34 AM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-23-2019, 12:37 AM
RE: Taxes - TheLeonardLeap - 03-23-2019, 01:06 AM
RE: Taxes - fredtoast - 03-23-2019, 11:49 AM
RE: Taxes - Brownshoe - 03-23-2019, 12:16 PM
RE: Taxes - BmorePat87 - 03-22-2019, 09:34 PM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-22-2019, 11:01 PM
RE: Taxes - BmorePat87 - 03-22-2019, 11:22 PM
RE: Taxes - Benton - 03-22-2019, 11:22 PM
RE: Taxes - Bengalzona - 03-22-2019, 11:59 PM
RE: Taxes - Benton - 03-23-2019, 12:47 AM
RE: Taxes - fredtoast - 03-23-2019, 11:54 AM
RE: Taxes - Brownshoe - 03-23-2019, 12:12 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)