04-18-2019, 09:11 AM
(04-18-2019, 08:50 AM)GMDino Wrote: "Violence is never the answer" that's about as clear and concise as I can say it. And I said it in the post you quoted. Don't be dishonest.
"Defending a Nazi" was in relation to the idea that your post was NOT defending nazis as it should not have been.
Reread your post, it doesn't say "Violence is never the answer" full stop.
Quote:Yes...a huff. It's a fictional show. Are to stop all forms of fictional media from saying anything "we" disagree with or that "might" incite violence?
Absolutely not, just the ones that flat out advocate violence, as this one did.
Quote:You post said your bigger problem was that some people get called nazi and fascists when they are not.
Nope. My point, and the only point being made by me, is that once you decide that violence is an acceptable answer to "X" ideology, opinion or political entity then who decides what other such entities can be acceptably targeted thusly. I'll reiterate, who gets the decide who it is, and is not acceptable to physically attack because you dislike their opinions?
Quote:I am not for violence at all. You brought up the subject of real nazis versus just those accused of it.
To the bold: If you wish to ignore my one, simple to read statement that "violence is never the answer" I can't continue this discussion.
I'm not ignoring it, I'm point out the qualifiers you attached to it. You can be very definitive in your response by saying, "No, it's not OK to punch a Nazi, just as it isn't OK to attack anyone because of their words or opinions."
