Little girl's encounter with Pope a farce

[Benton]

(09-29-2015, 02:36 PM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: He still can't provide evidence to the contrary.

All he showed is that some cavemen somewhere ate some other cavemen, specifically after they had already died.

He claimed early man would slaughter and eat their own when they were weak, his evidence didn't support that.

http://news.discovery.com/history/archaeology/cannibalism-early-humans-bones-101213.htm

Quote:"Think that a member of your group dies," Fernandez-Jalvo told Discovery News. "The body can give one day off from hunting, which was always dangerous at that time, and what to do with the dead body that may attract other dangerous carnivores that may attack the group."

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/04/0410_030410_cannibal.html

Quote:A growing body of evidence, such as piles of human bones with clear signs of human butchery, suggests cannibalism was widespread among ancient cultures. The discovery of this genetic resistance, which shows signs of having spread as a result of natural selection, supports the physical evidence for cannibalism, say the scientists.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1307936/Early-man-butchered-ate-brains-children-everyday-diet.html

Quote:Among the bones of bison, deer, wild sheep and other animals, scientists discovered the butchered remains of at least 11 human children and adolescents.... Scientists believe that early man ate fellow humans both to fulfill his nutritional needs and to kill off neighbouring enemy tribes.... And the fact that the bones were discarded with those of other animals suggests that there was no religious significance to the practice....Children will have been targeted as they would have been less capable of defending themselves, the study suggests.

Stop posting goofball stuff.