Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A win for states' rights
#10
(06-18-2019, 01:01 PM)michaelsean Wrote: Damn pro-business conservative justices.

The interesting thing is that I am sure if the argument had been made more in that direction then it may have been a different vote. But, the argument was with regards to federal supremacy of a law overseeing nuclear regulation. Some of the justices that ruled against the plaintiffs probably think that the owner of the land should be able to mine, but that wasn't the argument before them.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR





Messages In This Thread
A win for states' rights - Belsnickel - 06-17-2019, 04:04 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - bfine32 - 06-17-2019, 04:18 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - fredtoast - 06-17-2019, 04:24 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - bfine32 - 06-17-2019, 04:29 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - Belsnickel - 06-17-2019, 04:22 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - GMDino - 06-17-2019, 04:22 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - Belsnickel - 06-17-2019, 04:28 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - Belsnickel - 06-17-2019, 04:31 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - michaelsean - 06-18-2019, 01:01 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - Belsnickel - 06-18-2019, 01:15 PM
RE: A win for states' rights - fredtoast - 06-18-2019, 03:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)