06-18-2019, 03:21 PM
(06-18-2019, 01:15 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: The interesting thing is that I am sure if the argument had been made more in that direction then it may have been a different vote. But, the argument was with regards to federal supremacy of a law overseeing nuclear regulation. Some of the justices that ruled against the plaintiffs probably think that the owner of the land should be able to mine, but that wasn't the argument before them.
Some opined that the fed gov could seize the land through emanate domain and then mine.
