06-19-2019, 04:13 PM
(06-18-2019, 10:59 PM)Goalpost Wrote: They weren't right leaning in 2016
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/os-ed-endorsements-president-20161015-story.html
Yeah, they endorse Clinton. As a neo-liberal she was closer to mainstream Republicanism (or what was mainstream Republicanism) than Trump was.
(06-19-2019, 03:40 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Who cares what they think?
You should be careful though. The more the media blasts him, the more people will flock to him. You already saw this happen once before.
Newspaper endorsements have, indeed, become less valuable in modern times. They also acknowledge that what they say will fall on deaf ears to his most ardent supporters. But that's not who they are targeting. They are aiming this at "independents" and "moderates" that aren't behind him. Granted, it's probably still going to fall on deaf ears, but they make a pretty good argument.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
