06-22-2019, 02:25 AM
(06-22-2019, 02:03 AM)Dill Wrote: Jeezus, can you follow an argument or not?
Your defense of Trump implied this woman's story is related to a recent campaign announcement.
I only pointed out he made it clear from day one he was running again. Nuts to your "coincidence."
No one is "changing" your words. And yes, I always reply in MY words. You reply in yours I've noticed.
Stop sending discussions down the rabbit hole with semantic nonsense.
Further advice--defending Trump only backs you into a corner. Foreign policy flops, fixers, porn stars, profiting from office, nepotism, obstruction, sexual assault--there is no defending this guy. You back yourself into a corner every time.
Clinton was accused of sexually assaulting women and even rape, not a peep. One of our resident far leftists to this day refuses to say whether he believes the Clinton accusers, #metoo an all. Not engaging in whataboutism, merely pointing out inconsistencies in the opinions of others. Trump is not a morally virtuous person, by any means, but bfine's concerns and points are not invalid. Disdainfully discounting them out of hand doesn't lend your argument further validity.
