MAGA

[Dill]

(07-12-2019, 03:39 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Oh, was your comment directed solely at those against integration?  It certainly didn't come off that way.

Rockwell image of Marshals forcing integration. Not quite a Rorschach blot, was it? Posted on a thread themed by the question, "when do Trump supporters think America was great?"  Tacked on to a point by Benton, that drug use and violence are about the same as ever. Framed by the words "Some things have gotten better" (in contrast to the events represented in the picture), and the words "Or worse--depending on one's perspective." Both statements a reference to the present, to the legacy of integration.

You read into that a "thinly disguised attempt to paint those who don't embrace every change as bad people"?  Me engaging in behavior I "decry in others"?  A dog whistle?

(07-12-2019, 03:39 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Again, if that was the only societal change you were inferring with your post then I wouldn't have made the point I did.  However, as you infer in others, I inferred from your posting history and prior statements that was not the case.  You should be familiar with this practice as you recently advocated for it in another thread.
You are correct an accusation is not sufficient.  An accusation coupled with a concrete example is.  Also, there is no such thing as "reverse racism" there is only racism.  Maybe you're comfortable with certain racist statements or claims depending on the group they are directed tow
I'd be happy to discuss it.  I won't discuss it with a person engaging in racist behavior and then expecting to discuss racist behavior in others. 
I mentioned Fred because you were engaging in classic Fred behavior, but I will absolutely withdraw his name from further discussion here to mollify you.

I still don't know what "Fred-twisting" behavior is.  I cannot recall a single post by Fred as opaque and obfuscatory as yours in this thread.

Now reference to an undefined, mysterious "practice" of mine, which involves "inferring in others" and is "advocated" on another thread?  What??

And still talking about unspecified "racist statements" made somewhere. Dino's? Mine? You'll continue throw ther term "racist" around with neither definition nor examples, but you "won't discuss it with a person engaging in racist behavior and then expecting to discuss racist behavior in others."
That is a standard?? 

Define your terms, provide examples, offer proof of claims--that is what I "advocate" here and on every thread.

Connect your points to the thread, or this is just name calling and I am not interested in providing a foil for that.