07-26-2019, 01:28 PM
(07-26-2019, 04:19 AM)treee Wrote: Not necessarily. It is not unreasonable to posit that such a drastic change shouldn't be made by a simple majority, but a super majority.
(07-26-2019, 01:13 PM)treee Wrote: A second referendum 3 years later is hardly anti-democratic. What if a lot of people's minds have changed after learning new information?
One non-binding resolution that was pretty much evenly split is should not be interpreted as a mandate to completely change the economy. How is anyone supposed to have consistency in their government if you can completely do a 180 every time a wedge issue goes back and forth by one percent?
Excellent points.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)