Britain's own Trump

[*bfine32*]

(07-26-2019, 01:13 PM)treee Wrote: A second referendum 3 years later is hardly anti-democratic. What if a lot of people's minds have changed after learning new information?


One non-binding resolution that was pretty much evenly split is should not be interpreted as a mandate to completely change the economy. How is anyone supposed to have consistency in their government if you can completely do a 180 every time a wedge issue goes back and forth by one percent?

Of course it's anti-democratic. How can a government by by the people, of the people and for the people if we have Politicians second guessing or worse yet voiding their wishes?

This is nothing more than Parliament telling the population "You don't know what is good for you" and I honestly do not see how anyone that believes in freedom of choice can support the stance.