07-26-2019, 02:17 PM
(07-26-2019, 02:11 PM)GMDino Wrote: 'Tis the same!
Not even remotely. When you vote for a candidate for office their term of office is clearly indicated before you vote. Brexit was advanced as the "final word" on the subject. hence the terms of the vote were clearly described and illustrated prior to the vote taking place. ONce again, your analogy is childishly inaccurate.
Quote:The people voted for it...after three years nothing is done...people vote again on the subject.
People vote for POTUS and then two years later do it again because they don't like the results. That would be a direct comparison to what you are advocating, changing the rules midstream. You sound like the Seahawks fans after they lost the SB to us.
Quote:People vote for Obama...he pushes through the ACA...people vote out the people who voted for it to try and change it.
Yup, at the time prescribed by the election that initially put those people in office.
Quote:In our system we elect people to make the decisions for us (generally...not including state and local referendums), so our "revote" is every couple years we can change who is making those decisions.
Yes, and we revote within a set time frame that has been determined well before we make our votes. We don't change the rules midstream, we abide by them. What you are describing is the exact opposite of what you apparently believe.
