Britain's own Trump

[GMDino]

(07-26-2019, 04:56 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 2funny. my analogies have be dubbed "false". Yet those that assign falsehood to analogies do not chime in with the obvious error in your assertion. I wonder why.

No one has ever said it cannot be voted on again (you know that, it is why you didn't bold that part of your sentence). I'm saying it should not; the citizenry voted. I feel it's their government's responsibility to follow through on their wishes, not tell them they are wrong, or at least I would hope it is.

Your (personal) argument is that it should not be voted on again because it was voted on once.  But there was nothing to say it CAN'T be voted on again...you (personal) just don't think it should be because of the desired result.  (At the same time you (personal) are using the argument that anyone wanting a new vote just doesn't like the result. )

If there is nothing saying there can NOT be a new vote and the current situation as a result of the vote make it appear that the end result of the vote is not going to happen then why not another vote?

You (universal) can't just say "this vote was it...no more" without that being the actual case.  

If I'm wrong that there can NOT be another vote then this is moot.  But I'm gathering that was not the case that the Brexit vote was "a final word" so given the difficulties is making it work a new vote would be a sign of the end of democracy in Europe (paraphrasing).

And if there CAN be another vote then the argument that there CAN'T simply because it was voted on once is silly.