Britain's own Trump

[*bfine32*]

(07-26-2019, 05:13 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: It could be because I didn't care. It wasn't a conversation I was a part of and so I didn't feel the need to interject in such a way. I try to stay out of the drama between Dino, Dill, and SSF as much as possible and try to resist stirring the pot. I would kindly as that you not try to drag me into that.

Well I am of the opinion that if those we tend to side with point out fallacies in our argument we can work to curb the activity. For instance Dino could tell me my slant was faulty and I'd just chalk it up to "we disagree on everything" but if someone I agree with chimes in and tells me I may be off the mark; I'll take that under more consideration. IMO it can lend itself to more civil discord around here.

I know, I strive to do this. Just the other day someone I always (usually) agree with said something to someone I always disagree with that I felt was unfair and I chimed in and said so; even though I wasn't part of the conversation. I've seen folks plenty chime in into conversations they are not part of when they generally disagree with the poster. I see you assert to not be one of those.  

Do I need to share with you a thread where I was constantly called a troll by someone, with whom I was not conversing?