07-31-2019, 12:01 PM
(07-31-2019, 11:56 AM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: The Politico one that you linked had this in it, just clearing up Dino's confusion about the word "fire", as I'm sure you saw it in the article.
"In the most dramatic move so far, Texas Reps. Vicente Gonzalez and Filemon Vela told POLITICO Sunday that Bustos should fire her top aide, DCCC executive director Allison Jaslow."
https://yournews.com/2019/07/30/1118066/dccc-executive-director-forced-to-resign-because-shes-white/
Claiming that the organization was in “complete chaos,” the lawmakers demanded DCCC chairwoman Cheri Bustos “appoint a qualified person of color, of which there are many, as executive director at once.”
They had a meeting on Monday Morning with Bustos, after the meeting, the resignations started rolling. Say what you want, but that's forced because none of them planned to resign all at the same time. And obviously the people pushed out were not diverse enough, so that means it was based on race. Say it call it what you will. That's how anyone with an objective mind will see it.
You have someone who claimed responsibility for the lack of diversity and the person who was the director of diversity among the resignations. I'm curious how one can objectively say it was based on race when that is the case. The objective evidence points to their resignations being the result of their actions or lack thereof.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
