08-05-2019, 06:05 PM
(08-05-2019, 05:51 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Wouldn't fly as your putting a cost on a constitutional right. This would also unfairly punish poor gun owners. Additionally, this information could be sued to deny a rental or home purchase. Of course they wouldn't say that was the reason.
Hadn't thought of the 'cost on a constitutional right' argument. Interesting.
Gun ownership would be tossed in with a litany of other factors going into rental applications or home purchases. Gun ownership could be added to the list of reasons one could not be denied a rental along with race, religion, etc. But even though people are not supposed to discriminate on the current list, its hard to argue. If someone wants to rent a specific property enough, maybe they need to get rid of their uzi... I don't know call me crazy.
I'm racking my brain to think of other examples of 'cost on a constitutional right'...
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)