08-19-2019, 11:15 AM
(08-19-2019, 10:59 AM)Dill Wrote: I don't call you a "white nationalist" because you run interference for Trump on thread after thread. (See my discussion of authoritarian framing in post #35 above, and the link in post #55 below.)
That's a smart move on your part since I don't do that. This would be easily disproven on your part if it where true btw.
Quote:If you don't know what ethnic democracy is, and are unable to Google, all you have to do is ask--if your goal is clarity and not smoke.
I'm aware of what it is.
(08-19-2019, 11:00 AM)Dill Wrote: LOL all falls into place when you factor in the Illuminati. https://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/2/
Normally I don't track a red herring, but this one is based on such a desperate and unstable analogy, I cannot resist a few comments.
I'm guessing the consistent standard here would be to "disavow" BOTH illegal settlement of occupied territory AND an Iranian bomb. Is there any evidence I wouldn't do both?
Uhh, yes.
Quote:But Iran doesn't have a bomb, and until Trump trashed the Iran Deal, wasn't on the path to getting one.
The second part is patently untrue, but please continue.
Quote:Why should someone be "troubled" by Iran's disavowal of nuclear weapons?
By the disavowal, not at all. By then pursuing them anyways, absolutely.
Quote:What does Iranian nuclear policy have to do with illegal settlement of the West Bank--other than to distract from Israel's behavior?
Nothing, except to point out the obvious double standard you have when anything to do with islam comes into play. We get it, you don't like that Israel exists. Point taken, let's move on.
