10-02-2015, 03:06 PM
(10-02-2015, 02:44 PM)djs7685 Wrote: Whoa, whoa, whoa, back it up.
How in the hell is that picture generalizing? Are you aware of what "generalizing" means?? Apparently not.
Generalizing is saying something like "all liberals think that guns should be banned!" just because 1 liberal you spoke with feels that way. That's generalizing. Not every liberal feels that way, yet you're labeling an entire group of people by the opinion of very few.
Saying that "people who generalize are idiots" isn't generalizing, because it's flat out saying that IF you generalize, then you're an idiot. It's not making a claim about anybody that doesn't fall into that category.
Does that help you comprehend what that word means, or do you need me to try it a bit slower?
I was just asking a question based on your post. I was curious if women should just expect to be raped if they walk down a street where a prior rape occurred since you insinuated that the rich people were "asking for it" by driving their nice car in a neighborhood with an increased crime rate.
Should I just assume all conservatives are too dumb to intelligently respond to a question and actually comprehend what's being asked? I won't, because I'm not going to generalize everyone due to a handful of dingleberries.
lol. Your ability to grasp irony is about as good as your ability to understand football.
You were using extremism to try and prove a point that a woman shouldn't be held responsible for her actions.
A rich person who is driving through a crime infested neighborhood and is carjacked wouldn't be given any sympathy. So why should anyone feel sympathy for some woman that decided to walk home in a crime infested neighborhood?
Let me ask you, do you think Bergdahl was blameless for his capture?
