10-02-2015, 03:17 PM
(10-02-2015, 03:15 PM)SteelCitySouth Wrote: This is interesting but not for the reasons you think. This is a great example you have provided for the exact opposite of what you are intending.
Bergdahl, like everyone else is only responsible for his own actions.
What does this mean though. You seem to think this extends to him being responsible for his capture and I would argue the exact opposite. His captors are responsible for his capture, while he is responsible for desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. You'll notice he was not charged with being captured. This is due to the fact that someone other than him has to capture him.
No matter the situation a woman finds herself in, she is not responsible for the actions of another. Sam if some dude is raped by either another man or a woman. He is not responsible for the other persons actions.
So his actions led to his capture, yet you think he isn't responsible for his capture? That is absurd!
Go ahead though. Keep thinking your absurd thoughts.
