Campaign funding struggles for AOC..

[Aquapod770]

(08-21-2019, 02:25 PM)GMDino Wrote: Trump said the American people must be willing to accept financial hardships to win the trade war with China so that "we" can have better deals.

But we can't accept financial hardships to protect our water and air (those darn regulations) or any New Green Deal because that would cost money.  Or a national health care system.

It's a weird dichotomy.  It's okay for citizens to suffer so businesses can make more money but it's not okay for businesses to suffer so everyone can live healthfully.  

(between 51 and 93 trillion dollars)


I've posted numerous times on here that Trumps tariffs are dumb. Nice try. Still waiting for you to admit the GND is dumb. 

BTW if the climate really is (and should be) the focus, why is only 20% of the cost associated with reducing our carbon footprint? 80% of the cost is for social programs, not clean energy. If AOC had proposed the aggressive climate policies of the GND by themselves without the extra fluff thrown in the costs would be between 10.2-18.6 trillion over a decade. That's a lot easier of a pill to swallow than 51-93 trillion. Right? Wouldn't that get a dialog going too? 

Tell me why the GND is a good idea without bringing up Trump. AOC is just the lefts version of Trump. All fluff and no substance.