08-28-2019, 03:29 PM
(08-28-2019, 12:06 PM)hollodero Wrote: Well, no. What it means (I'd argue) is that Obama's scandals were minor in comparison.
And farther between.
In some cases, its not exactly clear, outside of Fox viewership, what was scandalous (Benghazi, IRS). E.g., why should the Bergdahl swap be a "scandal"?
In others, over reach was quietly checked (e.g. the PRISM surveillance system).
![[Image: liar%2B4.jpg]](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/--ypZI6k4hCw/WVPLOW8CauI/AAAAAAAAFiA/G1OnsaTEq6AlzUwW0fmD2PcQOUME2LDBQCLcBGAs/s1600/liar%2B4.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)