09-11-2019, 05:05 AM
(09-11-2019, 12:03 AM)bfine32 Wrote: 1. The article draws the correlation to the de-privatization and the funding of Obamacare; I did not. As it states:
As I stated from the beginning, that's just smoke being blown up our asses by a Robert Murdoch owned news outlet or the WSJ's edition of Fox News. You know that, right?
One, the Republican controlled House would have never approved the loan program if it actually did fund Obamacare.
Two, the WSJ could also make the claim this was to fund defense spending or the national debt, but didn't. I wonder why? Because they're owned by Robert Murdoch.
Quote:2. Of course they got bailed out. They got relief from a rash of defaulted loans. American citizen assumed the debt. I do remember the article is just a couple days old.
LOL
If the government paid the private lenders for loans already in default that would be a bailout. That isn't what happened.
Quote:3. Have 0 idea what Trump has to do with it, but a thread is not a thread without the 7 degrees of Donald Trump
I have zero idea what this has to do with Obamacare other than an unfounded claim by the WSJ.
Trump sought and obtained relief from his debt by declaring bankruptcy. Students can't do that to get relief from student loans and even if they are behind in their payments (meaning they are in default) they still owe the government money and the government can garnish their wages and tax returns. And that debt will follow them until they pay or die. Unlike Trump's debt from failed businesses.
Quote:You can address the points brought forth by the WSJ board or you can address my attempt to answer questions posed.
Um, in otherwords I can keep doing what I've been doing. Gee, thanks.
Quote: I've always made the mistake of answering questions posed.
More smoke.
Yeah, until you go into your town crier act, "Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye! By official decree of His, with a capital H, imperial potentate and soon to be a major motion picture, bfine has declared, "I'm done with this!" Because the altitude of the high horse He, with a capital H, rode out of here on prevents the sound of mere peons like you wretched refuse from reaching his ears or for Him, with a capital H, from stooping to your level."
You always need to announce you're taking the high road to give the false impression you're taking the high road. The need for the announcement is how I know of the insincerity. Because if you actually took the high road without the preemptive announcement then people wouldn't know you're taking the high road. Thus the need for the announcement and why it is only the appearance of taking the high road instead of actually taking the high road. Shit's more fake than Saturday morning rasslin'. Or windmill cancer.
