09-13-2019, 12:29 PM
(09-13-2019, 12:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: bfine made no such assertion; nor did bfine make it about Obama. bfine posted an OPED by WSJ that questioned a decision made by the Obama administration and disputed the assertion that it was Accounting Fraud without the proof of intent. But don't let that simple fact stop you from writing a lot of words and telling folks about my logic and how I was wrong.
Oh, here we go again. The problem with this argument is you have repeatedly agreed with the WSJ since you started this thread and you further went on to suggest other reasons why it was accounting fraud that have nothing to due with actual accounting fraud. But, the most important underlying reasons to the WSJ's accusation of fraud (and your agreement with their accusation) are the CBO's projections showing billions in profit. If that is the case, and it is, then Trump would have to be involved in fraud because the CBO's projections during the Trump administration showed billions in profit, also. But, neither the WSJ or you will acknowledge this because then the entire argument is moot because the WSJ editorial board isn't going to accuse the Trump administration of accounting fraud based upon those CBO projections showing billions in profits during his tenure . . . like they did with the Obama administration. They certainly wouldn't have made false accusations those billions were going to fund Obamacare during Trump's tenure like they did with Obama. It's like peeling an onion of bullshit. Just bullshit layered upon bullshit revealing more bullshit underneath.
So where does that leave us? With a Robert Murdoch owned newspaper with a conservative editorial board making false accusations to whip their conservative base into a lather against the dirty liberals. I'm surprised they missed the opportunity to throw the word "socialism" in there somewhere.
Also, your fake moral outrage didn't distract me from the fact you still haven't explained what nationalizing the market is supposed to mean.
