10-04-2015, 05:55 PM
(10-04-2015, 04:37 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: So then not the same sort of situation. Rumors and what is perceived as common knowledge is one thing. If any of them were to make a public announcement about it I'd bet the reaction would be similar. The Church has a long history of ignoring things like that, including homosexuality, unless it becomes a black eye to them. And sometimes even then they tend to be slow moving. But regardless of all of that, all of those priests, and the one in the OP, are not living up to the vows taken as members of the clergy. Really, it is no different than Kim Davis. In both situations someone has taken an oath to do a job and fulfill certain obligations. By violating the oath they can, and should, be dismissed.
Which is what I said:
He doesn't meet the requirements to hold the job...but he's completely capable of performing all the job duties.
Davis meets the requirements to hold the job...but refuses to perform all the job duties.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
