09-26-2019, 02:31 PM
(09-26-2019, 02:02 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: I will say that IF you look at Fitzpatrick's stats and then Dalton's...that it's hard to believe Fitz is graded higher.
They must think the team around him is terrible and the reason for his bad stats.
Overall, yes. As a passer, they have Dalton higher (though, not enough higher IMO) and what is bringing Dalton way down is his running and fumble grades. Huge difference there between fitz and Dalton.
Don't know though...i don't recall off-hand when Dalton's fumbles occurred and how their 'sacks taken' look, side by side. Dalton's stats are much better, even considering Dalton's lower than average comp% and almost the same number of INTs...seems like a lot of 'eye test' grading in some of the aforementioned areas.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
