Whistle-Blower’s Complaint Is Said to Involve Multiple Acts by Trump

[BmorePat87]

(09-27-2019, 07:54 AM)Stonyhands Wrote: I watched Fox tonight and the most recent few nights.  You glossed over a whole bunch of information that explains why everything you listed above that they said is more likely true than this BS “whistleblower” complaint.  

Like the fact that they rushed to an impeachment inquiry decision before they had the transcript and before they supposedly had the whistleblower report.  A report by the way that has been analyzed over and over and is said not to have been written by any CIA analyst but from an attorney’s standpoint as a a legal brief type of document.  One that several dems have had in there possession long before the transcript was released and the whistleblower complaint was formally released.  

An impeachment inquiry is just that, an inquiry. Knowing that the White House was refusing to release a whistleblower report that alleges that the president committed impeachable offenses is a solid reason to open an inquiry.

Quote:The transcript does not fit the whistleblower complaint narrative and the fake news msm is busy spinning this non stop.  Because the alleged report didn’t have any firsthand knowledge of the actual calls only what they heard some people talk about.  Which by the way you must have heard Nunes say that he deals with Whistleblowers all the time and the fact that this person DID NOT hear anything first hand and that they had a  ClEAR BIAS it’s two big red flags.  Forget the fact that the organizations that are behind all of this are funded by none other than George Soros and the whistleblower is going through the same attorneys that worked for Clinton and Schumer.  

It clearly does fit the narrative. Did you not read it?

Quote:I‘m watching Fox News and thinking to myself how anybody could possibly seriously believe the dem’s narrative with all the evidence that is out there saying otherwise.  Literally the entire impeachment case is based off of what one person heard other people talking about.  Why didn’t the actual people involved file a whistleblower complaint?  

Again... it literally fits the narrative. Did you not read it?

Quote:Ukraine is where the entire BS Russian collusion started.  If any of the stuff Levin, Ingram, Tucker, Solomon, Nunes, is saying is true doesn’t that bother any of you.  

None of the stuff they are saying is true. 

Quote:Doesn’t Hunter Biden’s role on a Board that he has zero experience or business being a part of on a Ukrainian company known to be under investigation and his dad’s known involvement in the firing of a prosecutor who’s sworn on a legal affidavit that he was in fact investigating that company before being fired raise any red flags.  

Hunter Biden had years of experience serving as a lawyer, lobbyist, and member of the board for companies before taking that job. Joe Biden wasn't the only person calling for the guy's termination as the guy was taking bribes to not investigate people. The Ukrainian government also continued to investigate the company and determined that there were no issues. This has been settled for a while.

Quote:My take is that some Dems caught wind that Trump was developing a tight relationship with the new Ukrainian leadership and that there’s some talks going around behind the scenes from the whitehouse and the DOJ as to the origination of the Dossier 1.0/Crowdstrike/Russian collusion hoax.  The dems were probably most likely to rig the primaries so that Biden was the candidate despite several polls showing he’s not the front runner.  Now lots of information is coming out of Ukraine regarding the false Russia collusion allegations which will very likely point to some Dems in DC.  Additionally all of the details of the Biden corruption in Ukraine regarding his role in protecting his son are emerging as well.  Just wait until they start investigating what happened in China.

If you believe these conspiracy theories, it may be time to turn Fox News off.