Whistle-Blower’s Complaint Is Said to Involve Multiple Acts by Trump

[Dill]

(09-27-2019, 07:54 AM)Stonyhands Wrote: I watched Fox tonight and the most recent few nights.  You glossed over a whole bunch of information that explains why everything you listed above that they said is more likely true than this BS “whistleblower” complaint.  

Like the fact that they rushed to an impeachment inquiry decision before they had the transcript and before they supposedly had the whistleblower report.  A report by the way that has been analyzed over and over and is said not to have been written by any CIA analyst but from an attorney’s standpoint as a a legal brief type of document.  One that several dems have had in there possession long before the transcript was released and the whistleblower complaint was formally released.  

The transcript does not fit the whistleblower complaint narrative and the fake news msm is busy spinning this non stop.  Because the alleged report didn’t have any firsthand knowledge of the actual calls only what they heard some people talk about.  Which by the way you must have heard Nunes say that he deals with Whistleblowers all the time and the fact that this person DID NOT hear anything first hand and that they had a  ClEAR BIAS it’s two big red flags.  Forget the fact that the organizations that are behind all of this are funded by none other than George Soros and the whistleblower is going through the same attorneys that worked for Clinton and Schumer.  

I‘m watching Fox News and thinking to myself how anybody could possibly seriously believe the dem’s narrative with all the evidence that is out there saying otherwise.  Literally the entire impeachment case is based off of what one person heard other people talking about.  Why didn’t the actual people involved file a whistleblower complaint?  

Ukraine is where the entire BS Russian collusion started.  If any of the stuff Levin, Ingram, Tucker, Solomon, Nunes, is saying is true doesn’t that bother any of you.  

Doesn’t Hunter Biden’s role on a Board that he has zero experience or business being a part of on a Ukrainian company known to be under investigation and his dad’s known involvement in the firing of a prosecutor who’s sworn on a legal affidavit that he was in fact investigating that company before being fired raise any red flags.  

My take is that some Dems caught wind that Trump was developing a tight relationship with the new Ukrainian leadership and that there’s some talks going around behind the scenes from the whitehouse and the DOJ as to the origination of the Dossier 1.0/Crowdstrike/Russian collusion hoax.  The dems were probably most likely to rig the primaries so that Biden was the candidate despite several polls showing he’s not the front runner.  Now lots of information is coming out of Ukraine regarding the false Russia collusion allegations which will very likely point to some Dems in DC.  Additionally all of the details of the Biden corruption in Ukraine regarding his role in protecting his son are emerging as well.  Just wait until they start investigating what happened in China.

Yow Stony, you are corroborating my Fox Report.

Have you read Trump's transcript and the Whistleblower's report? They fit hand in glove. And the Whistleblower report alleges more, like classifying the transcript to hide it. But  your post does not go by your own reading, but Sean and Mark's prompts for you.

Who has analyzed the report FOR YOU "over and over"?  Sean and Mark Levin.

You are saying "what if what ingraham, solomon, tucker etc are saying is true."  Sure. What if they actually brought forward evidence for their wild conspiracy claims instead of just claiming it exists. Their goal is just to get some counter-narrative circulating among the fox faithful in hopes people will doubt the evidence-based "fake news" narrative.


If you could pull yourself away from Fox for an hour or two in favor of the "fake news" you would find that Biden's "involvement" in the firing of a corrupt prosecutor amounts to no more than executing policy initiated not by him but by the US, the IMF and the EU. Biden was only one of many messengers. The corrupt prosecutor has "sworn an affidavit" which harms the people who fired him, claims he was doing exactly what every international investigative body says he wasn't doing--pursuing corruption. Jeezus.

My take is the Dems caught Trump violating his oath of office and bending official US policy in the service of a Russian-inspired conspiracy theory, not to mention using government resources and the power of his office to leverage a foreign government into providing dirt on a political opponent.

The "entire impeachment" is not based on "what one person heard." It is based on the phone transcript, which fits exactly what "one person heard" from many others. Not to mention the further corroboration coming from the DNI and Inspector General. Those "other people" will be providing their testimony soon.

Finally, have you not yet recognized that Fox always has a cloud of "emerging details" about Democrats that don't pan out?