Whistle-Blower’s Complaint Is Said to Involve Multiple Acts by Trump

[*bfine32*]

(09-27-2019, 01:08 AM)Dill Wrote: Sure. But now it's corroborated hearsay. No longer "hearsay" as legally defined and excluded from trial proceedings. The IG didn't just skim the report and say "sounds good."

Doesn't matter now if the whistleblower claims an angel came to him in a wet dream and told him about the Trump phone call.

No wait, it does matter because now there is a series of "first-hand" observers whose testimony looks to further secure the "hearsay" report.

The lawyers and others who helped hide the transcript are now subject to prosecution for knowingly covering up a crime. Some of these will crack and likely provide more info about other secreted transcripts.  Trump stains those around him. Barr's legacy shattered now.

Surrounded by bad people in a dysfunctional staff, expect more missteps (lol WH talking points sent to Dems) as the pressure increases. Public support for impeachment reached 49% tonight, says Rachel Maddow.

Glad we agree that the report was hearsay. I think I was the first in this thread to suggest it as such and a bunch of smart guys told me I had no idea. The next thing I'm curious to see is the relationship the sources had with the whistleblower. Hopefully he was in their chain of command. If so, then no one should be able to refute the information provided.

As to the allegations of Political Bias. It means nothing to me.