Who do you believe?

[6andcounting]

(10-03-2019, 09:16 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Except there was no evidence there was any action taken by either of those agents to do anything about the election and Strzok's testimony indicated it was about the American people not electing him, not anything related to the FBI. The idea that they took any action within their official capacities to tip the election, let alone that it is a known thing, would most appropriately be called fake news.

I'm glad the testified that they didn't do anything illegal. lol

I don't know how much sway they could have had, but it's the fact that the FBI agents investigating him are discussing the "insurance policy" they have against him and going back and forth saying "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!", and "No. No he won't. We'll stop it." Doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in the work of those investigating Trump.
 
They also discussed how the timing of their investigation will affect Trump before admitting “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there.” You don’t investigate until you have the truth and sit on the truth because you don’t like the outcome if you’re being impartial.