10-04-2019, 06:03 PM
(10-03-2019, 10:33 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Also, said universal background checks would require a national database of owned firearms to be enacted. Such a database could then be used in the future by Dems like Robert Francis, Biden and Warren who are openly campaigning, to varying degrees, on the confiscation of legally purchased private property. Those public, and finally honest, statements from leading candidates for POTUS (and Robert Francis) have utterly squashed any chance of universal background checks being agreed upon. It's almost like they don't really care about gun violence.
So just to be clear. The people who support a gun registry that would make it possible to enforce laws to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and mentally insane people don't care about gun violence?
If they don't care about gun violence then why are they opposed to high-capacity semi-automatic weapons?
Why do you think they are proposing these types of legislation if they don't care about gun violence?
Do the people who oppose universal background checks care about gun violence? And if so what are they doing about it. Seems all I hear is the talking point "enforce current laws" yet even you admit that it would require a gun registry to enforce any meaningful laws regarding background checks. So how can they demand enforcement and at the same time oppose the laws that make enforcement possible?
