Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Athletic Shorts With No Pockets?
#3
(05-28-2015, 12:29 PM)WeezyBengal Wrote: One of the reasons for no pockets is because they can cause injury (im serious). People's fingers can get caught in them. We werent allowed wearing shorts with pockets during inner-murals in college because of this. 

Also, if they are officially licensed Bengals shorts, the same ones that the players wear, why would they have pockets? You really think Jeremy Hill is out there carrying around a wallet and an iPod in his shorts while hes trucking over defenders? 

There still should be pockets....there are other non officially licensed products that pull the same shit. It's just stupid.
[Image: bey.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Athletic Shorts With No Pockets? - Steeler Eater - 05-28-2015, 12:49 PM
RE: Athletic Shorts With No Pockets? - J24 - 05-28-2015, 05:02 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)