Syrian Hmong

[*bfine32*]

(10-10-2019, 10:08 AM)Dill Wrote: Answers are lining up nicely.  Now the counter question:


LOL Some may still defend trampling on the Constitution to prevent a "legislative coup" ("Article II says he can do what he wants!"), but I didn't expect many Trump defenders to defend the Kurd betrayal.

Curious thing though--Trump's retreat seems to have so far silenced the anti-anti-Trumpers, the "independents" who don't watch Fox News but throw up Trump talking points fast as Hannity and Tucker.  This time around they aren't attacking Trump critics for forgetting Hillary or criticizing Trump just because his style is "different."

They may be "lining up" but I'm not sure the question posed has been answered; folks just sharing their thoughts on POTUS. Allow me to answer it directly. I am in favor of Military occupation in the ME and have always suggested it be expanded. So I can freely say I disagree with Trump's decision to pull out of the ME. Like most situation I would want this occupation to be a coalition.

What aspect of "trashing the Constitution" are being defended?