Syrian Hmong

[Dill]

(10-10-2019, 11:58 AM)bfine32 Wrote: What aspect of "trashing the Constitution" are being defended?

Trump's defiance of legal, Congressional supoenas comes to mind here, which is vigorously supported by Jim Jordan, Lindsay Graham, and the party of lockstep.

(10-10-2019, 11:58 AM)bfine32 Wrote: They may be "lining up" but I'm not sure the question posed has been answered; folks just sharing their thoughts on POTUS. Allow me to answer it directly. I am in favor of Military occupation in the ME and have always suggested it be expanded. So I can freely say I disagree with Trump's decision to pull out of the ME. Like most situation I would want this occupation to be a coalition.

Pretty sure your question was answered. The majority of people who have so far posted are not in favor of abandoning the Kurds. That means they are not in favor of pulling out of the ME altogether.  Or were you asking about support for "occupying" the whole ME or something?

"Military occupation" is another issue.  Occupation is what Israel has done to the West Bank. The Syrian campaign is not an occupation, nor is our presence in Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, or Syria.

This "occupation" was a coalition of some 80 countries--now all confused and adrift, as so many of our allies were after Trump pulled out of the Iran deal.