Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Glenn at odds with Bengals over concussion
(10-18-2019, 03:27 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I don't know what is happening.  I just don't see why the coach and the team would lie about something like this.  Why would Taylor say he was in full pads if he wasn't?  

Why would the team say he was cleared and then treat him like he was not?

Why would the Bengals claim Odom had a strain instead of a broken foot or Braham had a bone bruise instead of a tibial plateau fracture or any of the other false information they have released?

Probably because he was answering a bunch of question at a press conference he probably didn’t want to be at and he was asked about two players and the medical staff may not have done a good job of communicating to him Glenn was cleared for drills or full contact.

Here’s another thing to remember: studies have shown patients forget 50% of what their doctors tell them immediately. Of the remaining 50% of information retained 20-30% is incorrect. Which means patients only retain about 35% of the information their doctors give them. So how much do you think Zac Taylor retains correctly after the medical staff briefs him on all the injuries?

About 35%.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Glenn at odds with Bengals over concussion - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 10-18-2019, 04:08 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)