10-21-2019, 04:50 PM
(10-18-2019, 09:17 PM)hollodero Wrote: Which is a bit different to claiming she is a Russian asset.
To raise concern on how she is groomed by Russia, that one I could accept. Calling her an asset goes too far.
Here is what I think. I might actually be agreeing with you, but just disagree on the semantics.
Gabbard has made some comments and taken some positions that the Russians like. Those comments and positions are assets that the Russians can use even if Gabbard does not really want then to. So those would be "assets" to the Russians.
But I don't think Gabbard is being "groomed" because I don't think the Russians really control her. In fact I don't think the Russians really even support her. They can just use her comments and positions to sow discord among the Democrats and divide them.
Hillary is just hyper-sensitive to Russian meddling because she was the victim last time. If she really thought that Tulsi was working with the Russians she should have talked to her first instead of bring this out in the media.
