10-22-2019, 11:07 AM
(10-22-2019, 10:54 AM)GMDino Wrote: For the record here is what Clinton said:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics/hillary-clinton-tulsi-gabbard/index.html
So she didn't call her an "asset" and in fact never said her name and she jumped up to defend herself...as did a bunch of Russian bots.
So, was she wrong?
But I get that there are still a few of you here who deny that Russia interfered in 2016 and is trying again for 2020.
Just to be clear, because this is what Trump defenders do here constantly, you aren't providing the full context. In addition to using the word later by saying Jill Stein's "also a Russian asset", Gabbard had just commented on the claim that she was "an asset of Russia" during the debate, a claim a figure in the media made.
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)