Tulsi Gabbard Russian asset!

[GMDino]

I don't believe this site is very liberal...

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2019/10/22/what-the-new-york-times-now-says-hillary-clinton-said-republicans-not-russians-were-grooming-tulsi-gabbard/

Quote:What? The New York Times now says Hillary Clinton said Republicans, not Russians, were grooming Tulsi Gabbard?

Posted at 9:17 pm on October 22, 2019 by Brett T.
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
 [/url]

Remember when 2020 Democratic candidate Tulsi Gabbard went on an “unhinged” “outrageous tweet storm” after Hillary Clinton suggested in a podcast that Gabbard was being groomed by the Russians for a third-party run to split the Democratic vote? Well now Hillary Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill is claiming that the New York Times got it wrong, and Clinton had actually said Republicans, not Russians, were grooming her as a third-party candidate.

That’s kind of a big mistake.

Quote:
Nick Merrill@NickMerrill

On Friday, the NYT did a piece about a podcast Secretary Clinton did with David Plouffe. They incorrectly quoted her saying that the “Russians” were “grooming” a candidate running in the Democratic primary. They rightfully fixed it to reflect that she was taking about the GOP.
[img=857x1200]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EHgMn4nWoAY8y_u?format=jpg&name=small[/img]


4,010
2:34 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

3,033 people are talking about this

Quote:
Nick Merrill@NickMerrill



Replying to @NickMerrill

In yesterday’s paper, @superwuster wrote an opinion piece accusing Secretary Clinton of trading in conspiracy theories, based off of comments that she didn’t make.



1,357
2:34 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

537 people are talking about this





Merrill’s thread goes on a bit, but we’re most concerned with the New York Times’ conflation of Russian and Republican.

Quote:
Maryn McKenna

@marynmck



Replying to @NickMerrill

There is no correction appended to the story online? (I am not arguing with you, I can see in the Wayback Machine that it was changed between 18 Oct and 19 Oct.) Has the NYT acknowledged the change?

43
7:40 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

See Maryn McKenna's other Tweets

Quote:
Adzter@Adzter1996



Replying to @NickMerrill

They already got out the message they wanted. No one who believed it will know of the change.

71
6:31 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

See Adzter's other Tweets

Quote:
...melanintary, my dear.@dlnodots



Replying to @NickMerrill

...so in the end, what can be derived from this entire debacle is @nytimes serves nothing-burgers.

118
4:50 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

See ...melanintary, my dear.'s other Tweets

Quote:
d_mcc@d_mccarthy37



Replying to @NickMerrill

Uhhhhhhhhhh that’s one hell of an edit

87
8:21 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

See d_mcc's other Tweets

Quote:
Tom Matzzie

@tommatzzie



Replying to @NickMerrill

What about your “if the nesting doll fits” quote? P.s. get a blue check mark please

82
6:28 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

See Tom Matzzie's other Tweets

Quote:
SH@sweethegemony



Replying to @tommatzzie @NickMerrill

that confirmed Gabbard was referenced, not that Russians were her groomers

26
7:05 PM - Oct 22, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

See SH's other Tweets

[url=https://twitter.com/sweethegemony]