10-24-2019, 09:08 AM
(10-24-2019, 01:10 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: It's not semantics. Two claims were lobbied:
1. Groomed by GOP
2. Russian asset
NYT got the first one wrong but the second one right. The "narrative" of her being an asset was still true.
The initial argument I saw was that she said Gabbard was an asset who was being groomed by the Russians. That wasn't what was said.
Either way I think Clinton had a point that what Gabbard talks about and says is loved by the Russians/Republicans.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.