10-08-2015, 07:08 AM
I had to get up extra early today anyway so lets take the time to do this one by one, shall we?
John Lott tells a story of a conversation had while Obama was a professor. So its his word only. And Lott is, according to the Fox News website:
So strike one.
Fast and Furious was to try (poorly) to track if guns were coming illegally back into the US. While a failed attempt (and not the first by a Presidential administration) it was hardly designed to make people suddenly fear guns in American's hands.
Strike 2.
Lastly you own paranoia is not fact. Just because you think someone is after yer gunz doesn't mean its true. Nor do "tapes". We've seen recently how tapes can be manipulated. Right?
Strike 3.
Going backwards:
Your third link actually did have one citation! Congratulations! Sadly it didn't work. And "getting guns of the street" does not sound the same as confiscating any and all guns.
Strike 1.
Your second link (the one with the open mic recording)? Even though the words are on the screen the "author" of the article leaves out one line said "They want guns out of the hands of the bad guys...but they don't want any regulations". Whoever is talking (even the article doesn't know) is referring to someone else wanting to sound tough...but not actually do anything. And then perhaps it takes a shot at them for acting tough and having their "little guns".
Strike 2.
And of course the top two links are to the same story.
Strike 3.
And a weak pop out to the pitcher.
End of game.
No one is coming fer yer gunz. No one. Ever.
Will there be a nutcase who suggests we shouldn't have guns? Sure. But it will not happen. Ever.
I would buy a gun and stand beside you to fight such a movement!
But stop pretending "they" are out to get you. People who talk like that when they are clearly being delusional should not have guns.
(10-08-2015, 02:12 AM)Naranja Tigre Wrote: Well let's see. Author John Lott claims Obama stated he thinks people shouldn't be able to own guns. There's his fast and furious scandal intended to create assault rifle violence at the border and sway public opinion, and democrats have been caught on tape saying that gun confiscation is the ultimate goal of gun control.
And lets be honest, why wouldn't it be the goal? Shootings will never stop. The left just needs to be honest about what they want.
John Lott tells a story of a conversation had while Obama was a professor. So its his word only. And Lott is, according to the Fox News website:
Quote:Dr. John R. Lott, Jr.http://www.foxnews.com/archive/john-lott/index.html
John R. Lott, Jr. is a columnist for FoxNews.com. He is an economist and was formerly chief economist at the United States Sentencing Commission. Lott is also a leading expert on guns...
So strike one.
Fast and Furious was to try (poorly) to track if guns were coming illegally back into the US. While a failed attempt (and not the first by a Presidential administration) it was hardly designed to make people suddenly fear guns in American's hands.
Strike 2.
Lastly you own paranoia is not fact. Just because you think someone is after yer gunz doesn't mean its true. Nor do "tapes". We've seen recently how tapes can be manipulated. Right?
Strike 3.
(10-08-2015, 03:00 AM)Blutarsky Wrote: Ever?
You cant be that naïve.
http://www.examiner.com/article/open-mike-reveals-n-j-senators-contempt-for-gun-owners-confiscation-goal
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/15386-open-mic-catches-dems-plot-to-confiscate-guns-diss-owners
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/gun-laws/no-one-wants-to-ban-or-confiscate-guns-huh-these-quotes-from-anti-gun-leaders-say-otherwise/
Going backwards:
Your third link actually did have one citation! Congratulations! Sadly it didn't work. And "getting guns of the street" does not sound the same as confiscating any and all guns.
Strike 1.
Your second link (the one with the open mic recording)? Even though the words are on the screen the "author" of the article leaves out one line said "They want guns out of the hands of the bad guys...but they don't want any regulations". Whoever is talking (even the article doesn't know) is referring to someone else wanting to sound tough...but not actually do anything. And then perhaps it takes a shot at them for acting tough and having their "little guns".
Strike 2.
And of course the top two links are to the same story.
Strike 3.
And a weak pop out to the pitcher.
End of game.
No one is coming fer yer gunz. No one. Ever.
Will there be a nutcase who suggests we shouldn't have guns? Sure. But it will not happen. Ever.
I would buy a gun and stand beside you to fight such a movement!
But stop pretending "they" are out to get you. People who talk like that when they are clearly being delusional should not have guns.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
