Only on La La Land

[*bfine32*]

(11-08-2019, 03:40 PM)Au165 Wrote: You would be wrong again. By being locked up illegally they were separated from their kids who were sent to be housed in other facilities.

https://www.splcenter.org/news/2019/09/05/judge-blocks-ice-denying-parole-asylum-seekers



Yes, we should pay for treatment for people who were convicted of misdemeanors but then subjected to borderline torture practices. We don't separate kids from parents who get misdemeanor speeding tickets in this country, we did not apply an appropriate level of response based on the level of the offense.

EDIT: MS. L V. ICE is the national class action case that the ACLU has filed specifically over LEGAL asylum seeking families being separated.

You're quite quick and insistent on throwing out the "you're wrong" assertion. This article mentions about those who surrendered to crossing points. As I mentioned earlier many crossed illegally and then sought asylum. A practice some may claim to be LEGAL. But I will concede that you can find various opines to support your assertion from unbiased sources (what that last one really from Southern Poverty Law Center?). You can further argue that the Trump's Zero tolerance policy was aimed at every immigrant if you want; however, I'll roll with it was only aimed at those that cross our borders illegally. I'll wait for you to assign right/wrong.

  We'll further disagree with the notion that our government should flip the bill for those that crossed our borders illegally.