11-08-2019, 04:20 PM
(11-08-2019, 03:57 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You're quite quick and insistent on throwing out the "you're wrong" assertion. This article mentions about those who surrendered to crossing points. As I mentioned earlier many crossed illegally and then sought asylum. A practice some may claim to be LEGAL. But I will concede that you can find various opines to support your assertion from unbiased sources (what that last one really from Southern Poverty Law Center?). You can further argue that the Trump's Zero tolerance policy was aimed at every immigrant if you want; however, I'll roll with it was only aimed at those that cross our borders illegally. I'll wait for you to assign right/wrong.
We'll further disagree with the notion that our government should flip the bill for those that crossed our borders illegally.
From the first article...
Quote:But even though he entered the U.S. legally at an official border crossing, where the Trump administration promised asylum-seekers would not be prosecuted or separated from their children, José was detained and had his son taken away, according to advocates who are helping with his case.
MS. L V. ICE is another case currently in the court system of a lady who went to a legal port of entry directly from her home country and was detained and separated.
