Only on La La Land

[BmorePat87]

(11-11-2019, 11:08 AM)bfine32 Wrote: 1. And there's been 100s of reports that the conditions, faculty, and facilities, were very beneficial to the children

2. I don't think the facilities were/are a joke; we provide(d) for these children after their parent(s) used them in committing a crime. I found your obvious appeal to emotion fallacy to be a joke.

3. We caused nothing other than upholding our laws. I know the liberal option is catch and release, but it's not working. 

4. And thinking parents shouldn't break the law while accompanied by their children makes me pro child. And thinking these parents should try petition for asylum the legal way makes me anti- illegal immigration. 

Have there been reports that the conditions were beneficial? This topic has been rehashed many times, and this is the first time I've seen that claim. I didn't think "cages and space blankets" was a logical fallacy since it's the actual condition they were in.

I do not think you actually believe that these conditions were good or caused no harm. I don't think any person believes that separating children from parents for months and putting them in makeshift prisons would not cause any harm and would be beneficial to them. I think you do not like illegal immigration from Latinos and support any measure to stop it, even measures that harm legal asylum seekers and children. 

I think this is another in a long series of disingenuous posts from you.