Only on La La Land

[*bfine32*]

(11-11-2019, 12:18 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Have there been reports that the conditions were beneficial? This topic has been rehashed many times, and this is the first time I've seen that claim. I didn't think "cages and space blankets" was a logical fallacy since it's the actual condition they were in.

I do not think you actually believe that these conditions were good or caused no harm. I don't think any person believes that separating children from parents for months and putting them in makeshift prisons would not cause any harm and would be beneficial to them. I think you do not like illegal immigration from Latinos and support any measure to stop it, even measures that harm legal asylum seekers and children. 

I think this is another in a long series of disingenuous posts from you. 

Your assertion of my disingenuous posting history aside. I do not support illegal immigration from anyone and  I fully support lawful measures to stop it; so I suppose guilty as charged (although stating "any measures" my be.....what do you call it....disingenuous. This was not the first admin to put children in "cages with space blankets" and what legitimate (not staged or from a prior administration) there were was of children in holding facilities where they are to remain for less than 3 days until they can be transferred to a more long=term facility.

We did not create this situation and the present administration did what it though was best to curb the epidemic. No amount of appeal to emotion or "fake news" changes that. If these parents cared so much for their children they would have sought asylum through legal means. But they didn't. they broke the law using their children as pawns and now la la land says US citizens must pay for them breaking the law.